Entries in theology (12)

Providence and Ravens

-%20%20%20_1187604.jpg

 
Until I came north, everything I knew about ravens, I learned in Sunday school. (Okay, in Sunday school and from Edgar Allan Poe.) We had their close cousins, the crows, where I grew up in Minnesota, but I don’t remember ever seeing a raven. According to this map, there should have been some there, but I guess I missed them. 

It’d be impossible for a child to grow up in the Yukon and not notice the ravens. They are here and they are not silent.

raven%204Northerners tend to have a love-hate relationship with these big black birds. If we don’t lock the lids tight on our garbage cans, the packaging from our food waste will be spread all over the neighbourhood by trash-picking ravens. Can you see that the one in the photo (above left) is carrying a scavenged treasure? Once I saw a raven fly off with a whole package of cheddar cheese from a bag of groceries left in the back of a pickup truck in the supermarket parking lot. I’d like to have heard the conversation in that kitchen when it came time to make the grilled cheese sandwiches for supper.

-%20%20%20_1187599.jpg

 
It’s because ravens seem to relish life that we love them. When it comes to ravens, bird-brained isn’t stupid, and some of that raven brain power is used purely for amusement. Ravens love to swirl and roll in the air currents near the edge of the escarpment rimming town, performing stunt-pilot-worthy aerobatics displays. I have it on good authority that ravens have been seen sliding down snowbanks just for the fun of it. Another favorite pastime is playing “Nonny-nonny-nonny, you can’t catch me!” with my dog. Frankly, in an I.Q. competition between my dog and a raven, I’m not sure my dog would come out on top.

Their extreme cleverness shows itself in their hoarding behaviour. Sometimes ravens will store bits of stolen food in little caches so they can come back for it later, and studies have shown that they find their stockpiles again because they remember where they put them. They also spy on other ravens to see where they are burying their goodies, so that when the opportunity arises, the neighbour’s stash can be raided. Sometimes a hoarding raven will only pretend to bury food in order to throw the thieving spies and raiders off the trail. You might say that ravens are the greedy geniuses of the bird world.

raven%205 

But let’s get back to what I learned about ravens in Sunday school, way before any real-life raven encounters.  I learned, first of all, that it is God who feeds them.

Who provides for the raven its prey,
when its young ones cry to God for help,
and wander about for lack of food? (Job 38:41)

That’s a rhetorical question and we’re supposed to answer, “God does.” If you need further confirmation, see Psalm 147:9 and Luke 12:24.

God intentionally provides prey and other goodies for the ravens. Yes, they dumpster dive and trash pick and forage for berries and scavenge for carrion and hunt small rodents. They even eat carcass-feeding maggots and beetles. (How’s that for opportunistic snacking?) And this is how God  feeds them.

raven%206According to Wikipedia, the raven’s “diet may vary widely with location, season and serendipity,” which my dictionary defines as “the occurrence or development of events by chance in a happy or beneficial way.” It’s not quite serendipity, of course, if God feeds them, is it? But if we changed “by chance” to “by God’s intent” in that definition, we’d have a fairly good definition of providence. God intentionally controls the occurrence and development of events with a happy and beneficial result for the ravens.

So by providence, it is, that the ravens are fed. I leave the lid on my garbage can unfastened and it is God’s provision for them. The unguarded bag of groceries in the back of the pick up? Providence for the birds. Road kill? God’s good gift to the hungry young ones. Ravens have enough brain power to devise clever schemes for keeping their food finds all to themselves. This, as well, is God’s providence for them. All these things are good gifts from God who feeds the ravens.

I learned, too, back in my Sunday school days, that God, who feeds the ravens, provides for his people. We are, after all, of  “much more value … than the birds! (Luke 12:24)” In a favorite story from the Bible, God even used ravens to provide for one of his people.
Now Elijah the Tishbite, of Tishbe in Gilead, said to Ahab, “As the Lord, the God of Israel, lives, before whom I stand, there shall be neither dew nor rain these years, except by my word.” 2 And the word of the Lord came to him: 3 “Depart from here and turn eastward and hide yourself by the brook Cherith, which is east of the Jordan. 4 You shall drink from the brook, and I have commanded the ravens to feed you there.” 5 So he went and did according to the word of the Lord. He went and lived by the brook Cherith that is east of the Jordan. 6 And the ravens brought him bread and meat in the morning, and bread and meat in the evening, and he drank from the brook. (1 Kings 17:1-6) 
God commanded the ravens to feed Elijah and they brought him bread and meat twice a day. Not only do ravens receive good things from the Lord’s providential hand, but they have provided good things out of the Lord’s providential hand. Ravens were the means by which the Lord provided for his prophet Elijah. Like many of God’s miracles, this one turned the natural order on its head. These thieving scavengers and self-serving hoarders of rotting meat and moldy bread, became, at God’s word, generous servants and deliverers of fresh meat and fresh bread.
 
ravens%207
 
I’m guessing I won’t ever be fed directly by ravens. (To be honest, I’m not unhappy about that. I’ve seen where those beaks have been.) But like Elijah, I can trust that God will provide. God, who feeds the ravens, knows what I need; and God, who feeds the ravens, will feed his children, too.
 
All photos by Andrew Stark. Click on photos for larger views. 
Posted on Wednesday, April 23, 2008 at 09:37AM by Registered Commenterrebecca in , , , | Comments6 Comments | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Meme: Passion Quilt

I’ve been tagged by Kim of Hiraeth for the passion quilt meme. Here are the instructions.

  • Post a picture or make/take/create your own that captures that about which YOU are most passionate for students to learn.
  • Give your picture a short title.
  • Title your blog post “Meme: Passion Quilt.”
  • Link back to this blog entry.
  • Include links to 5 (or more) educators. (I won’t be doing this. Tagging people is not favorite thing.)

If you’ve read here for a while, you  won’t be surprised by where my passion lies.

The Cross 

lifting%20up%20the%20cross%20gustave%20dore 

This depiction of Christ being lifted up on the cross is by the French illustrator, Gustave Dore.

I’m passionate about the cross of Christ and here are a few of the reasons.
 
  • The cross is the solution to everything that’s not right with the universe, including what’s not right with me. No matter what the human need, it is, ultimately, met at the cross, and all real hope is grounded there.
  • So many of God’s attributes are seen most fully in the cross. The cross is, for instance, the pinnacle of the expression of God’s grace. It was also a public display of God’s mercy, love, holiness, righteousness and justice. Do you want to know God? Look through the lens of the cross.
  • What happened on the cross is, in one sense, simple: Christ died for our sins. He bore the penalty for our sins so that we can be forgiven by God and reconciled to him. On the other hand, there are so many layers to the work of the cross! Or maybe it’d be better to say that the work of the cross can be seen from many different angles and they all fit together to paint one picture that grows more and more glorious as it is viewed from additional angles. That makes it an infinitely fascinating work and an infinitely satisfying work.
  • The work of the cross is the center of everything: the gospel, God’s plan for history, our Christian faith.
  • The cross is powerful: it transforms lives; it gives meaning to life. It is because of the cross that we are new creatures; and the cross, in turn, calls us to live out our new-creaturely lives in “the way of the cross.” It is because of the cross that we are to “take up our cross daily.”
  • For those who are redeemed by it, the cross of Christ will be an enduring passion, a passion that only increases in eternity. Christ’s work on the cross is the centerpiece of the new song:  

    “Worthy are you to take the scroll
    and to open its seals,
    for you were slain, and by your blood you ransomed people for God
    from every tribe and language and people and nation,
    and you have made them a kingdom and priests to our God…

    “Worthy is the Lamb who was slain,
    to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might
    and honor and glory and blessing!” 
Posted on Tuesday, April 1, 2008 at 03:40PM by Registered Commenterrebecca in , , , | Comments3 Comments | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

How KJV-Onlyism Is Incompatible with Sola Scriptura

I’m working on moving some of the posts from my old blog over to this one, so I may occasionally repost a re-editted one. And that’s what this is—an editted old post.
 
What I’m hoping to show in this piece is that adherents of KJV-Onlyism, while claiming to be faithful to the principle that the Bible should the final arbitrator of faith and practice, in reality use things other than scripture as the final arbitrator of faith and practice when it come to the issue of acceptable texts and translations of the scripture. First, let me explain that in this post I’m not referring to people who prefer to use the King James Version of the Bible, or even those who prefer to use only the King James Version of the Bible, but with the strain of KJV-Onlyism that teaches that the King James Version of the Bible is the only true word of God in the English language. (This last category is the only catergory that I would lable KJV-Onlyist. The first two categories I call KJV preferred.)

Click to read more ...

Posted on Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 12:38PM by Registered Commenterrebecca in | Comments10 Comments | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Christ's Active and Passive Obedience and Our Justification

Jesus, Thy blood and righteousness
My beauty are, my glorious dress….

(Nicolaus Zinzindorf, 1700-1760,
translated by John Wesley, 1703-1791)

Everywhere I look recently, I see the mention of the active and passive obedience of Christ, and what (or whether) they both  contribute to our justification. The concepts of the active and passive obedience of Christ were included in the last three questions from the Westminster Larger Catechism that I’ve posted—all three questions regarding justification—although those particular terms weren’t used. But the ideas are there, with the catechism clearly teaching that both the active and passive obedience of Christ are necessary for the justification of sinners. And one of the books I read and reviewed recently, By Faith Alone, dealt a bit with the active and passive obedience of Christ and whether both are necessary grounds for our justification. So I’ve been thinking about the two kinds of obedience and what they contributed to our justification, and if I’m thinking about it, you know I’m going to write about it.

Click to read more ...

Posted on Monday, July 9, 2007 at 11:27AM by Registered Commenterrebecca in , | Comments7 Comments | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Richard Hooker on Justification

Historical20Theology.jpg

 …and imputed (or alien) righteousness.

From A Learned Discourse of Justification, Works, and how the Foundation of Faith is Overthrown:

There is a glorifying righteousness of men in the world to come; and there is a justifying and a sanctifying righteousness here. The righteousness wherewith we shall be clothed in the world to come is both perfect and inherent. That whereby we are justified is perfect, but not inherent. That whereby we are sanctified, inherent, but not perfect.

Posted on Friday, June 29, 2007 at 10:03AM by Registered Commenterrebecca in , | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

One is the Onlyist Number of Sovereignty

the … only Sovereign, the King of kings and Lord of lords …

(1 Timothy 6:15) 

sov·er·eign·ty (sŏvər-ĭn-tē)
n., pl. -ties.

  1. Supremacy of authority or rule as exercised by a sovereign … .

By definition, to be sovereign over something means to have the highest (or supreme) authority or rule over it. Therefore, there can be only one sovereign over any one thing, and sovereignty over any one thing can’t be shared, since there can only be one supreme authority or rule over any single thing.

If you accept this definition of sovereignty (and you should, since both the dictionary and the verse say so), and you believe that there is one Sovereign over all the universe (and you should, since this verse and others says so), then you must believe that this one Sovereign has the highest authority over every single thing in it. 

Given this definition of sovereignty and that God is the one Sovereign over all the universe, here are few absurd phrases seen on the Baptist Board this week in regards to God’s sovereignty:

  • Limited sovereignty. God’s sovereignty cannot be limited, because, first of all, he is sovereign over every single thing in the universe, so his sovereignty cannot be limited in regards to the number of thing he is sovereign over. Secondly, God’s sovereignty cannot be limited in regards to the extent of his sovereignty over any one thing because highest rule can never be less than highest rule and still be highest rule.
  • Shared sovereignty. God can’t share sovereignty, because he is sovereign over every single thing, and sovereignty over any single thing can’t be shared, since …well …there is only one supreme ruler over every single thing.
  • Remitting sovereignty. God cannot remit sovereignty, because to remit sovereignty over any one thing would mean that  someone or something else would be sovereign over that one thing, and God would not be the one Sovereign over all the universe.  And if he were not the one Sovereign over all the universe, he would not be the one God of the Bible.
  • Allowing others to have sovereignty. God cannot allow others to have sovereignty. Everything said about God remitting sovereignty applies here as well, since the ideas are the same.  There is only one with sovereignty because there in only one Sovereign.
Elementary math, you might say: More than one can’t be supreme; more than one can’t be highest; universal sovereignty can’t be divided.
 
But if it’s such a simple idea, why is it so hard for people to understand it?  
Posted on Friday, May 11, 2007 at 11:17PM by Registered Commenterrebecca in | Comments9 Comments | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

What the Resurrection Means for Believers

He is risen!
He is risen indeed!
 
Throughout the epistles of the New Testament, we are taught that believers are united with Christ in His death and resurrection, and that union with Christ changes things for us. Here are two glorious personal benefits come to the believer because Christ has risen.
 
  • Christ’s resurrection means that we can be certain that we will be resurrected after we die:
    But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep. For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead also came through a man. For just as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive. But each in his own order: Christ, the firstfruits; then when Christ comes, those who belong to him. (1 Corinthians 15:20-23 NET)
    In the same way that being included with Adam brought us death, belonging to Christ assures us that we will rise again after we die. Christ’s present resurrected life is a promise to those who belong to Him that they will be brought with Him into the same resurrected life when he returns.

    Christ’s resurrection included the resurrection of his body and so will ours. Paul tells us that the sort of body that Christ had when he walked the earth after His resurrection and with which He ascended and now rules from heaven is the same sort of body that we will have when we are raised at His coming.
    It is the same with the resurrection of the dead. What is sown is perishable, what is raised is imperishable. It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body. So also it is written, “The first man, Adam, became a living person”; the last Adam became a life-giving spirit. However, the spiritual did not come first, but the natural, and then the spiritual. The first man is from the earth, made of dust; the second man is from heaven. Like the one made of dust, so too are those made of dust, and like the one from heaven, so too those who are heavenly. And just as we have borne the image of the man of dust, let us also bear the image of the man of heaven. (1 Corinthians 15: 42-49 NET)
    Our resurrected body will be a reproduction of the one the man of heaven has. Just as our identification with Adam brought us perishable bodies, our identification with Christ in his resurrected life will bring us imperishable bodies. The mortal will become immortal, so that we can sing along with Paul and Isaiah:
    Death has been swallowed up in victory.
    Where, O death, is your victory?
    Where, O death, is your sting? (1 Corinthians 15:55)
    This is the hope we have. We will be raised with incorruptible bodies to live forever with the One who takes us with Him in His resurrection.

  • Christ’s resurrection changes things for us right now in the life we live as believers.
    But God, being rich in mercy, because of his great love with which he loved us, even though we were dead in transgressions, made us alive together with Christ—by grace you are saved! and he raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly realms in Christ Jesus.. (Ephesians 2:4-6 NET)
    The resurrected life that comes into completeness at our glorification when we receive our resurrected bodies is already within us. We have been made alive together with Christ and  a new sort of life has begun—a recreated life:
    Therefore we have been buried with him through baptism into death, in order that just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we too may live a new life. For if we have become united with him in the likeness of his death, we will certainly also be united in the likeness of his resurrection. (Romans 6:4,5 NET)
    Our new life is grounded in our association with Christ’s resurrection. Because we are in Christ, we are new creation. We have begun our lives in the realm of the resurrection and sin no longer has dominion over us: the old things have passed away and the new things have come. The changed life we have—the life in the Spirit—comes to us through our inclusion with the risen Christ; and based on this new reality, we are called to live a new kind of life.
    Therefore, if you have been raised with Christ, keep seeking the things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Keep thinking about things above, not things on the earth, for you have died and your life is hidden with Christ in God. When Christ (who is your life) appears, then you too will be revealed in glory with him. So put to death whatever in your nature belongs to the earth…. (Colossians 3:1-5a NET)
    We are urged to put aside the things we once loved and the passions we once followed as the old sort of person we once were. Now we have been clothed with the new person, one “that is being renewed in knowledge according to the image of the one who created it (Colossians 3:10)”; and we are called to have new loves and new passions, seeking heavenly things. We must clothe ourselves in the power of the resurrection and live according to the fruit the Spirit produces within us.

    As men and women of the new life, we need to “present [ourselves] to God as those who are alive from the dead and [our] members to God as instruments to be used for righteousness (Romans 6:13 NET).” We can do this knowing that there is no reason for sin to defeat us as we work out the victory over sin that has already become reality in Christ’s resurrection, a victory that will come to its consummation when we are raised with Him when He comes again.
Christ’s resurrection proves to all that He is Lord of all, and it is through union with His resurrection that He becomes Lord in truth to those who belong to Him.
 
 He is risen!
He is risen indeed!
 
This is the companion post to the previous old post. 
 
Posted on Saturday, April 7, 2007 at 09:06PM by Registered Commenterrebecca in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

What the Resurrection Says to the World

He is risen!
He is risen indeed!
 
While Christ’s resurrection has special significance for those who are united to the resurrected Christ through faith, his resurrection also sends a message about Jesus Christ to everyone, believer and unbeliever alike.

  • The resurrection is evidence that Jesus is the Promised One.
    David prophesied that the Messiah would not see corruption, and at Pentecost, the apostle Peter tells us this prophesy is fulfilled by the resurrection of Jesus: 
    … [T]he patriarch David … [b]eing therefore a prophet, … foresaw and spoke about the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses. Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this that you yourselves are seeing and hearing… .
     
    Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified. (Acts 2: 29-36 ESV)
     
    It is because Jesus was raised that we can “know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ.” His resurrection confirms his fulfillment of messianic prophesy, proving that he is the long awaited Promised One.
     
  • The resurrection declares that Jesus is the Son of God in power.
    Jesus was born in weakness, and during his earthly ministry and perfect obedience unto death, we see his human frailty; but with the resurrection, a new phase of Jesus’ human existence has dawned. In his resurrection, Jesus is shown to be the Son of God in power. Paul tells us that Jesus was
    …descended from David according to the flesh and was declared to be the Son of God in power according to the Spirit of holiness by his resurrection from the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord… (Romans 1:3,4 ESV)
    The resurrection announces to the world that Jesus Christ, who came and lived and died as one of us, has now been appointed to a position of power and authority.

  • The resurrection is proof that Jesus is appointed Judge of All.
    The apostle Paul told the people of Athens that Jesus’ resurrection gives assurance to all people everywhere that he is the one whom God has appointed to judge the world:
    The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead. (Acts 17:30, 31 ESV)
    We know Jesus Christ is the Judge of All because he has been raised, and the only reasonable response to the surety of this promise of judgment by Christ is repentance.
The Jesus of history is not just another prophet or teacher or humble servant, but the Promised One, the Son of God in power, and God’s appointed Judge of All.  We can know these things for certain becaise they have been verifired by the historical resurrection.
 
The resurrection calls all people to respond by turning from rebellion against Christ to reverance of him.  The resurrection calls everyone to affirm this universal message: Jesus Christ has been made Ruler of All and is declared before all as worthy of worship. The resurrection  is confirmation to all people that
God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. (Philippians 2:9-11 ESV)
 
He is risen!
He is risen indeed!
 
 This is an old Easter post from the old blog, but I wanted to have it here, too, and it seems like now’s a good time to repost it.
 
Posted on Saturday, April 7, 2007 at 10:55AM by Registered Commenterrebecca in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Hypercalvinists

You thought they were an extinct bird, didn’t you? Nope, they may be rare, but they exist, and the Baptist Board seems to have more than their fair share of them. Right now, I’m in a discussion with someone who doesn’t believe in duty-faith. In other words, this person doesn’t believe that the non-elect have a duty to believe, which is one of the classic hypercalvinistic beliefs.

Because they are rarish birds, the temptation is to ignore them. The problem in this case is that this hypercalvinist claims to be a Calvinist. Spurgeon, says he, is a “weak Calvinist”, while he’s the real sort. So there his posts stand, confirming all the suspicions about Calvinism that many noncalvinists already have, and it’d be a mistake to leave him unchallenged.

You don’t know what hypercalvinists are? They come in different breeds, but here are two common signs of a true hypercalvinist:

  • The denial that people have a duty to believe before they are regenerated by the Holy Spirit and enabled to believe. This comes from the idea that God can’t hold people responsible to do what they are unable to do. In this case, the argument is that the gospel calls people to believe that Christ died specifically for their sins, and since Christ only died for the elect, if people in general have a duty to believe the gospel, they are being held responsible to believe something that is a lie. Therefore, God cannot hold people responsible for not believing the gospel, since the gospel isn’t true for them anyway.
  • Based on the previous point, hypercalvinists deny that there is a universal call or offer in the gospel.
So that’s where I was for a while this afternoon. There are some discussions I can take part in without much thought, because I know the various arguments inside, outside, upside down. This isn’t one of those. I’ve never done this before and I’ve already made a couple of mistakes, but you are welcome to check things out anyway. I figure it’ll be a learning experience.

In a related note, someone else in another Baptist Board conversation is arguing that God is the author of sin, and this time it isn’t just a terminology thing. This man believes that God causes people to sin in exactly the same way that he causes people to do good: God is “… the Agent, or Actor of Sin, or the Doer of a wicked thing”, to quote Jonathan Edwards. I’d comment in that one, too, but I can only handle one thread at a time.

Related post: The Authoring of Sin

 

Posted on Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 12:19PM by Registered Commenterrebecca in | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint

Now It Comes Out

In the comments of Monday’s post on the Baptist Board discussion I was participating in, I mentioned that
[w]hat really bothers me about the system being put forward in that thread is that it makes God unjust. People don’t go to hell because God has just grounds for sending them there. After all, according to this theory, justice has been satisfied on behalf of every person
After I wrote that, I felt a little bit guilty, because although I could see that logically, this is where the so-called system was leading, it hadn’t actually been said yet. Well, now it has. From the proponent the view under discussion:
Justice can condemn, but one can be condemned apart from any concept of justice as well. God has satisfied justice through His own sacrifice on our behalf. However, that is not the only way someone can be condemned, as the Bible clearly shows.
Well, yes, one can be condemned apart from any concept of justice, if the judge is an unjust judge.
 
By the way, this isn’t typical universal atonement (You know, the unlimited side of the unlimited vs. limited atonement discussion!), which has God’s justice satisfied potentially on behalf of every person, but only actually satisfied on condition of faith. Here’s a short summary of the usual version of universal atonement, taken from this comparison chart.
Christ’s redeeming work made it possible for everyone to be saved but did not actually secure the salvation of anyone. Although Christ died for all men and for every man, only those who believe on Him are saved. His death enabled God to pardon sinners on the condition that they believe, but it did not actually put away anyone’s sins. Christ’s redemption becomes effective only if man chooses to accept it.
Notice that universal atonement does not “actually put away anyone’s sins”, except as a person comes to faith. In that way, universal atonement does not have God condemning people who have no crimes counted against them. Neither does limited atonement, which has Christ’s redeeming work putting away only the sins of his people. Limited vs. unlimited atonement is not the real issue here.
 
Update, March 1: No blogging today because I’m still working hard at this BB discussion. Leslie (see comments) took the time to read through the whole thing. As she says, there’s some convoluted thinking there. One example: In response to my statement that God can’t condemn someone without just cause, we have this:
I’m sorry, but God can do what He wants.
 
I know a lot of people question the value of these sorts of discussions. I think that if you have the stomach for this sort of thing, and a rather thick skin, you can learn a lot from participating. At the very least, you’ll solidify what you already know. When someone comes up with some rather novel idea, as in the case in this discussion, all the better, because you can’t rely entirely on the apologetic work that others have done. When you have to develop the arguments yourself, you know what you know. However, it’s not for everyone, and it can be time consuming, which is why I began blogging and mostly gave up discussion boards. Blogging takes so much less time!
Posted on Thursday, March 1, 2007 at 07:14PM by Registered Commenterrebecca in , | CommentsPost a Comment | EmailEmail | PrintPrint
Page | 1 | 2 | Next 10 Entries