The email sent will contain a link to this article, the article title, and an article excerpt (if available). For security reasons, your IP address will also be included in the sent email.
I’m working on moving some of the posts from my old blog over to this one, so I may occasionally repost a re-editted one. And that’s what this is—an editted old post.
What I’m hoping to show in this piece is that adherents of KJV-Onlyism, while claiming to be faithful to the principle that the Bible should the final arbitrator of faith and practice, in reality use things other than scripture as the final arbitrator of faith and practice when it come to the issue of acceptable texts and translations of the scripture. First, let me explain that in this post I’m not referring to people who prefer to use the King James Version of the Bible, or even those who prefer to use only the King James Version of the Bible, but with the strain of KJV-Onlyism that teaches that the King James Version of the Bible is the only true word of God in the English language. (This last category is the only catergory that I would lable KJV-Onlyist. The first two categories I call KJV preferred.)
Return to Article